Resource 10 · Production standard · v1.0

The Production Readiness Standard

Nine evidence-based checks with a published scoring method for deciding whether software is safe to release and practical to operate.

Practical guidePracticalYours to use

The working guide

Follow the evidence across the whole system.

A pass is not a feeling. Version 1.0 uses the same evidence states, weights, thresholds, and critical-finding cap on every assessment.

Published scoring method

How evidence becomes a verdict.

  1. 01
    Score evidence

    Each criterion is Pass = 2, Warning = 1, Fail = 0. An evidence gap receives 0 until it is verified; it is never silently treated as a pass.

  2. 02
    Apply weights

    Authentication 12%, authorization and isolation 15%, secrets 10%, input handling 10%, transactional integrity 13%, performance 8%, testing 10%, observability 10%, compliance and audit surface 12%.

  3. 03
    Apply the critical cap

    A confirmed critical failure in identity, isolation, secrets, money movement, or regulated-data evidence caps the overall score at 54 and produces a Hold verdict.

  4. 04
    Assign the verdict

    Ready requires 85 or more with every check at its threshold. Conditional release is 70–84 with no critical failure. Anything else is Hold.

01

Authentication and access control

Pass threshold: 90

  • Server-side identity verification
  • Session expiry and revocation
  • Privileged access cannot be self-assigned
02

Authorization and data isolation

Pass threshold: 95

  • Every sensitive read and write is authorized
  • Tenant boundaries are enforced below the interface
  • Negative cross-user and cross-tenant tests exist
03

Secrets and key management

Pass threshold: 90

  • No production-capable secret reaches a client bundle
  • Keys have clear owners and rotation paths
  • CI blocks committed credentials
04

Input validation and error handling

Pass threshold: 85

  • Untrusted input is validated at the boundary
  • Errors fail safely without leaking sensitive detail
  • Partial operations have defined recovery behavior
05

Payments and transactional integrity

Pass threshold: 95

  • Money state has an authoritative record
  • Webhooks are verified and idempotent
  • Reconciliation detects missed or duplicated events
06

Performance and scalability

Pass threshold: 80

  • Critical paths have measurable budgets
  • Queries and queues are bounded under expected load
  • Capacity assumptions are documented
07

Automated testing and CI

Pass threshold: 80

  • Critical workflows have meaningful automated coverage
  • Build, test, and migration checks run consistently
  • Failures block release rather than become warnings
08

Observability and deployment

Pass threshold: 85

  • Operators can detect and diagnose critical failures
  • Deployment and rollback are repeatable
  • Alerts have owners and actionable context
09

Compliance and audit surface

Pass threshold: 90

  • Sensitive data is classified and its residency and egress are known
  • Privileged and sensitive actions leave durable audit evidence
  • Retention, deletion, and regulated-workflow responsibilities are explicit

Evidence to keep

Leave a record another person can verify.

  1. 01Repository and architecture evidence
  2. 02Representative environment and deployment configuration
  3. 03Critical-workflow test results
  4. 04Monitoring, rollback, and operator runbooks

Choose the next useful step

Use the guide to define the first accountable decision.

We can review the evidence with your team and turn the gaps into a scoped plan without taking ownership away from you.

Scroll to Top