PHI crosses product boundaries
Intake, messaging, documents, analytics, AI, support, exports, and integrations can each change exposure.
Specialist engineering audit · fixed scope
Trace protected data through the whole care workflow.
Review PHI boundaries, roles, consent, logging, audit trails, retention, exports, integrations, and operational handoffs as engineering evidence—not as a certification claim.
No mandatory callSenior-reviewedDeveloper-ready output
3–5 daysTypical review
Named seniorAccountable owner
EvidenceDeveloper-ready
AccessRead-only first
The decision before delivery
Generic reviews miss the risk inside the workflow.
A specialist audit follows the real domain and production paths instead of applying a generic checklist.
Access needs a care context
Clinician, staff, patient, administrator, and service access must match purpose and workflow.
An audit log must explain the event
Identity, object, action, timestamp, source, change, and relevant reason must be usable during review.
Exact output
A specialist report with a bounded next step.
Findings explain exposure, evidence, remediation, acceptance criteria, dependencies, and effort.
PHI data-flow map
Collection, storage, transmission, processing, analytics, AI, export, and deletion.
Role and access assessment
Patient, clinician, staff, administrator, service, and support boundaries.
Auditability and logging review
Security events, clinical actions, changes, exports, and operational access.
Consent and retention evidence
Purpose, state, withdrawal, retention, deletion, and downstream effects.
Integration and handoff review
EMR, lab, pharmacy, payment, messaging, and document workflows.
HIPAA-aligned engineering plan
Technical gaps, acceptance evidence, owners, and specialist-review boundaries.
How the work happens
Go deeper where the business can actually fail.
The method adapts to the audit domain while preserving the same evidence and accountability standard.
01Map protected-data flow
Trace PHI through users, systems, vendors, AI, logs, exports, and operational support.
PASS 0102Review roles and purpose
Test access, minimum necessary behavior, session, support, and administrative paths.
PASS 0203Inspect evidence and lifecycle
Review audit history, consent, retention, correction, export, and deletion behavior.
PASS 0304Test integrations and handoffs
Assess EMR, lab, pharmacy, messaging, payment, and document failure states.
PASS 0405Deliver the engineering-readiness plan
Separate product engineering work from legal, privacy, certification, and specialist obligations.
FINALAn honest boundary
Know when this is—and is not—the right product.
Qualification protects both teams and prevents a compact review from being sold as certification, incident response, or an enterprise programme.
RIGHT FIT
Use this audit when the specialist risk is material.
- A healthcare product handles PHI or sensitive care data
- Enterprise or provider review is approaching
- AI touches clinical or documentation workflows
- Access, consent, audit, or handoff evidence is incomplete
NOT THIS PRODUCT
Use a different qualified path when the need exceeds scope.
- HIPAA certification or legal advice
- Clinical safety validation or medical-device assessment
- Formal penetration testing
- A product with no defined care workflow
Code, access, and accountability
Your code stays yours.
Read-only first
Access starts at the minimum level required to establish evidence.
NDA available
Confidentiality can be agreed before repository access is granted.
Access removed
External access is revoked at delivery or at the agreed audit-window end.
Named senior review
Automation collects evidence; a senior engineer owns and signs the decision.
Connected resources
Use the smallest useful next step.
Free tools reduce uncertainty before purchase. Service and lane links explain what happens when implementation is required.
Straight answers
Before access is granted.
Is a call required?
No. The direct audit path is designed to begin from a short intake, approved access, and checkout. A conversation remains available as a separate option.
Will Zenveus make changes during the review?
Not unless the product explicitly includes a repair sprint. Reviews begin read-only and separate findings from implementation.
Can our own team use the report?
Yes. Findings are written with evidence, remediation, acceptance criteria, and effort so another qualified team can implement them.
Is this certification or a penetration test?
No. Engineering readiness can prepare a product for specialist review, but it does not replace legal advice, certification, or a formal penetration test.
Start without a meeting
Send the minimum we need to begin.
This review form is ready for the secure checkout and repository-access integration. The page remains a draft until those commercial systems are connected.
The next decision
Make the specialist risk visible and fixable.
Start from evidence, receive a written decision, and choose implementation only after the scope is clear.