Security & Data Isolation
Authentication, authorization, tenants, secrets, APIs, webhooks, dependencies, and storage.
Deeper evidence for a specific decision
Audit the risk that a generic review cannot see.
Choose a focused review for security, diligence, AI cost, or regulated-domain engineering readiness.
No mandatory callSenior-reviewedDeveloper-ready output
5 auditsFocused products
3–5 daysTypical depth
Fixed scopeBefore access
No callRequired to start
The decision before delivery
One audit should not pretend to answer every question.
Each specialist product has an explicit boundary, evidence model, and next-step path.
Technical Due Diligence
What an investor, acquirer, enterprise customer, or incoming CTO will find.
AI Cost & Reliability
Cost per workflow, routing, caching, latency, retries, limits, observability, and evaluation.
InsurTech Readiness
Carrier, broker, policy, rating, document, claims, auditability, and data boundaries.
Healthcare Readiness
PHI boundaries, access, logs, audit trails, consent, retention, exports, and handoff.
Exact output
A focused answer, not a larger generic report.
Each audit ends with evidence, prioritized work, and a decision appropriate to its domain.
Decision summary
A plain-language answer covering launch position, material risks, and the recommended path.
Severity-ranked findings
Critical, high, medium, and low findings separated from overall Standard pass/fail maturity.
Evidence and reproduction
File paths, configuration, affected workflow, and enough detail to verify the issue.
Developer-ready remediation
Recommended change, acceptance criteria, dependencies, and estimated effort.
Keep / refactor / rebuild
A written recommendation that preserves sound work instead of defaulting to replacement.
Next-step routing
Your team, a focused sprint, specialist audit, hardening engagement, or Pod - whichever fits.
How the work happens
A common evidence standard. Different specialist passes.
The production paths and acceptance evidence change with the audit domain.
01Access and baseline
Confirm repository, environment, stack, critical workflows, and the decision the review must support.
HOUR 0–202Automated evidence
Inspect dependencies, secrets, configuration, build behavior, and obvious security or quality failures.
PASS 0103Senior engineering review
Trace architecture, authorization, data, payments, integrations, and failure behavior.
PASS 0204Production-path checks
Test the paths that affect users, revenue, isolation, release confidence, and recovery.
PASS 0305Standard scoring
Score the evidence against the nine-part Zenveus Production Readiness Standard.
PASS 0406Signed verdict
Deliver the findings, decision, effort band, and the smallest responsible next step.
FINALAn honest boundary
Know when this is - and is not - the right product.
Qualification protects both teams and prevents a compact review from being sold as certification, incident response, or an enterprise programme.
RIGHT FIT
Choose specialist depth when the question is already known.
- Security or tenant risk is the concern
- External diligence is imminent
- AI cost or reliability is blocking scale
- Industry workflows require domain-specific evidence
NOT THIS PRODUCT
Start broad when the failure domain is unclear.
- You only need a quick independent verdict
- There is no working product
- Production is actively down
- You need formal certification or legal advice
Code, access, and accountability
Your code stays yours.
Read-only first
Access starts at the minimum level required to establish evidence.
NDA available
Confidentiality can be agreed before repository access is granted.
Access removed
External access is revoked at delivery or at the agreed audit-window end.
Named senior review
Automation collects evidence; a senior engineer owns and signs the decision.
Connected resources
Use the smallest useful next step.
Free tools reduce uncertainty before purchase. Service and lane links explain what happens when implementation is required.
Straight answers
Before access is granted.
Is a call required?
No. The direct audit path is designed to begin from a short intake, approved access, and checkout. A conversation remains available as a separate option.
Will Zenveus make changes during the review?
Not unless the product explicitly includes a repair sprint. Reviews begin read-only and separate findings from implementation.
Can our own team use the report?
Yes. Findings are written with evidence, remediation, acceptance criteria, and effort so another qualified team can implement them.
Is this certification or a penetration test?
No. Engineering readiness can prepare a product for specialist review, but it does not replace legal advice, certification, or a formal penetration test.
Start without a meeting
Send the minimum we need to begin.
This review form is ready for the secure checkout and repository-access integration. The page remains a draft until those commercial systems are connected.
The next decision
Choose depth because the decision requires it - not because the catalog is larger.
If the broad verdict is enough, we will say so before a specialist scope is proposed.